Download E-books Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science PDF

This quantity explores the basic matters all for bringing phenomenology including the cognitive sciences, and offers a few examples of analysis positioned on the intersection of those disciplines. the themes addressed right here conceal loads of floor, together with questions about naturalizing phenomenology, the fitting tools of phenomenology and the way they are often utilized in the empirical cognitive sciences, particular analyses of conception, realization, emotion, mind's eye, embodied stream, motion and company, illustration and cognition, inters- jectivity, language and metaphor. moreover there are chapters that target empirical experiments related to psychophysics, conception, and neuro- and psychopathologies. the concept that phenomenology, understood as a philosophical procedure taken via thinkers like Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Ponty, and others, can supply a good contribution to the cognitive sciences is a comparatively fresh inspiration. sooner than the Nineteen Nineties, phenomenology was once hired in a critique of the 1st wave of cognitivist and computational ways to the brain (see Dreyfus 1972). What a few give some thought to a moment wave in cognitive technology, with emphasis on connectionism and neuros- ence, unfolded chances for phenomenological intervention in a extra optimistic manner, leading to proposals like neurophenomenology (Varela 1996). therefore, bra- imaging applied sciences can flip to phenomenological insights to lead experimen- tion (see, e. g. , Jack and Roepstorff 2003; Gallagher and Zahavi 2008).

Show description

Read or Download Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science PDF

Similar Phenomenology books

Time and Narrative, Volume 1 (Time & Narrative)

Time and Narrative builds on Paul Ricoeur's prior research, within the Rule of Metaphor, of semantic innovation on the point of the sentence. Ricoeur right here examines the construction of which means on the textual point, with narrative instead of metaphor because the ruling quandary. Ricoeur reveals a "healthy circle" among time and narrative: time is humanized to the level that it portrays temporal event.

Kant and Phenomenology

Phenomenology, including Marxism, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy, ruled philosophy within the 20th century—and Edmund Husserl is generally concept to were the 1st to enhance the concept that. His perspectives prompted numerous very important later thinkers, reminiscent of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty, who ultimately grew to become phenomenology clear of questions of information.

Degrees of Givenness: On Saturation in Jean-Luc Marion (Indiana Series in the Philosophy of Religion)

The philosophical paintings of Jean-Luc Marion has opened new methods of talking approximately spiritual convictions and studies. during this exploration of Marion’s philosophy and theology, Christina M. Gschwandtner offers a complete and important research of the tips of saturated phenomena and the phenomenology of givenness.

Extra info for Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science

Show sample text content

For whereas philosophers can make clear the suggestions utilized in technological know-how and thereby supply a major carrier to technology, it's a mistake to imagine that technology can have a lot of an impression on philosophy. actually, Bennett and Hacker even think of the supposition that medical facts might contravene a philosophical research ridiculous (Bennett and Hacker 2003, 404). of their view, we should always no longer devote the error of complicated metaphysical or epistemological theories with empirical claims which might be corroborated by means of a few experimentum crucis. therefore, the relation among philosophy and empirical technological know-how is a one-way company. it's an program of ready-made techniques. there's no reciprocity, and there's no suggestions. the appliance doesn't bring about a amendment of the unique research. this can be definitely one kind of reaction to the problem posed to philosophy by way of the revival of naturalism. yet as i've got simply advised, I don’t imagine this can be the way in which phenomenology has replied or should still reply. To permit an exam of normal language-use be our basic, if no longer particular, consultant to a philosophical research of the brain is much too restrictive and underestimates the measure to which traditional language displays common sense metaphysics. It blocks the way in which for concrete phenomenological analyses that will display facets and dimensions of the brain that aren't easily on hand to any mirrored image on good judgment (consider for example Husserl’s investigations of the constructions of time-consciousness or pictorial cognizance) and which even as could be challenged and enriched by means of descriptions supplied via empirical technological know-how. in contrast, might be it isn't completely with no cause that the fashion of analytical philosophy defended by means of Bennett and Hacker has been accused of marketing a type of semantic inertia and conceptual conservatism. Empirical facts can serve to problem and corroborate theoretical analyses. Conversely, conceptual research gives you instructions and instruments for the empirical scientists and can additionally assist in the layout and improvement of experimental paradigms. yet even though empirical findings are very important, we should always evidently no longer omit that they're open to interpretation. Their interpretation will frequently depend on the framework during which one is working. hence, the theoretical impression of an empirical case isn't really unavoidably whatever that may be simply decided. even supposing i might argue that phenomenology may still concentrate on empirical findings, this doesn’t entail that it's going to additionally inevitably settle for the (metaphysical and epistemological) interpretation that technological know-how supplies of those findings. you will need to inspire the trade among phenomenology and empirical technology, however the threat of a fruitful cooperation among the 2 will not be make us deny their distinction. I see no incoherence in claiming that phenomenology may be proficient through the simplest on hand clinical wisdom, whereas whilst insisting that the last word matters of phenomenology are transcendental philosophical and that transcendental philosophy differs from empirical technological know-how.

Rated 4.57 of 5 – based on 47 votes