Download E-books The Making of Marx's 'Capital', Volume 2 PDF

By Roman Rosdolsky

Pdf observe: this can be retail pdf from EBSCO that has reflowed textual content, so it doesn't reproduce the particular booklet format. Vector, absolutely searchable, bookmarked, and pdf pagination corresponds to actual e-book pagination.

Rosdolsky's Making of Marx's 'Capital" is a massive paintings of interpretation and feedback, written over fifteen years by means of one of many most effective representatives of the eu marxist culture. Rosdolsky investigates the connection among numerous models of Capital and explains the explanations for Marx's successive reworkings; he offers a textual exegesis of Marx's Grundrisse, now greatly to be had, and divulges its methodological riches. He offers a critique of later paintings within the marxist culture at the foundation of Marx's primary contrast among 'capital in general' and 'capital in concrete reality.' The Making of Marx's Capital' was once first released in 1968 as Zur Enstehungsgeschichte des Marx'schen 'Kapital". 'The unmarried most sensible exegesis on Marx's Capital that i've got ever learn ...the tone is enterprise, thoroughly undogmatic and beautifully lucid.' Robert Heilbroner, ny evaluate of Books

Show description

Read or Download The Making of Marx's 'Capital', Volume 2 PDF

Similar Political Economy books

Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media

During this pathbreaking paintings, now with a brand new creation, Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky exhibit that, opposite to the standard picture of the scoop media as cantankerous, obstinate, and ubiquitous of their look for fact and safeguard of justice, of their real perform they safeguard the commercial, social, and political agendas of the privileged teams that dominate family society, the kingdom, and the worldwide order.

On Economic Theory & Socialism: Collected Papers (Collected Works of Maurice Dobb) (Volume 2)

This quantity collects released papers and essays from largely scattered and inaccessible assets, a few of which seemed for the 1st time while this publication was once initially released. within the first a part of the publication the topics diversity from the speculation of wages and up to date traits in monetary concept to economists’ feedback of capitalism and socialism, investment-policy in under-developed nations, and financial development below the Soviet 5 yr Plans.

The Social Economics of Jean-Baptiste Say: Markets and Virtue (Routledge Studies in the History of Economics)

This booklet makes use of archival and released assets to put Say in context, on the confluence of a number of significant currents in social philosophy. The Say that emerges from this learn is much from being the single dimensional popularizer of Smith and proponent of libertarian ideology that he's frequently depicted as. particularly he's an eighteenth-century republican attempting to knit togther aid at no cost markets and commercial improvement with a profound recognize for the significance of the legislator, the administrator and the educator within the construction and upkeep of civil society

Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy (Routledge Foundations of the Market Economy)

This selection of essays from one of many significant Austrian economists operating on this planet this day brings jointly in a single position a few of his key writings on a number of fiscal concerns.

Extra resources for The Making of Marx's 'Capital', Volume 2

Show sample text content

172 (78–79). 60 See the significant commentaries on this in Lenin, The State and Revolution and Trotsky, The Revolution Betrayed, pp. 52–54. 61 Marx lists these deductions as: 'First, cover for replacement of the means of production used up. Secondly, additional portion for expansion of production. Thirdly, reserve or  insurance funds to provide against accidents, dislocations caused by natural calamities etc. ' Only the remainder of the product therefore is 'intended to serve as means of  consumption'. But 'before this is divided among the individuals, there has to be deducted from it: First, the general costs of administration not belonging to production . . . moment, (footnote continued on next page)      Page 435 been made — exactly what he gives to it. What he has given to it is his individual quantum of labour . . . He receives a certificate from society that he has furnished so  much labour . . . and with this certificate he draws from the social stock of means of consumption as much as costs the same amount of labour. '62 In other words, he  receives mere certificates of labour the sole purpose of which is to regulate social distribution according to the labour principle. However, there is no room for a law of  value in such a society because the form of production which exists here is completely different from commodity production and because the regulation of production  and distribution is not left to the blind play of the market, but is subject to the conscious control of society. It would of course be tempting to go into the question of the operation of the law of value in the Soviet Union and the so­called People's Democracies in this  connection. However, this subject goes beyond the framework of our immediate task. In addition we do not think that we could say anything on this question which  could measure up to the clarity and depth of the work of E. Preobrazhensky,63 the most famous economist of the Russian revolution. The main line of his argument  consists in the view that any anti­capitalist transformation in an industrially backward country must take place under the conditions of a continuous struggle between the  law of value, inherited from the capitalist past, and the diametrically opposed principle of socialist planning; and that the destiny of socialism depends on the outcome of  this struggle. And if today numerous economists in the Soviet bloc elevate the law of value to the ranks of a socialist principle of distribution, this shows not only the  extent of the theoretical gulf between them and Preobrazhensky and his contemporaries but also how far social and economic relations in the Soviet Union have  become separated from the original aims of the October Revolution of 1917. Let us summarise : the chief distinction between Marx's conception of socialism and that of his predecessors is its scientific character, the fact that he uses the scientific  understanding of the present social (footnote continued from previous page) that which is intended for the common satisfaction of needs, such as schools, health services etc.

Rated 4.87 of 5 – based on 48 votes